Ask Ian: Why Don't More Rifles Have Captive Pins?
Forgotten Weapons
•
9m 44s
Edit: I mixed up the selector and rear pin holes; the rear takedown pin hole is not stepped. Sorry!
From Ryan on Patreon:
"Why do more rifles not have captive takedown pins? It seems that if someone is developing a rifle from the ground up there are almost no drawbacks to having them, especially if the rifle is going to be widely fielded. Is there a hidden cost?"
Having captive pins does add a few more small parts, machining operations, and assembly complexity to a rifle design. However, more important is that not all materials are conducive to captive pins. There needs to be a way to house the spring and detent pin necessary to create a captive takedown pin, and materials like stamped sheet metal and polymer are not usually well suited to that. Stamped steel has no space, and drilling the necessary holes in this polymer walls creates weak points.
Up Next in Forgotten Weapons
-
Ask Ian: Good Bullpup Conversions
From John on Patreon:
"You've covered your fair share of strange conversion of firearms. Have you ever come across a bullpup conversion that was actually useful, and not a kludge?"Nope.
That's basically the whole answer.
Okay, to elaborate a bit, it's because making a bullpup use blue ...
-
Ask Ian - What Was the Best WW2 Rifle...
From crablegs21 on Utreon:
"In your opinion and in hindsight, which country had the most optimized cartridge for the their primary infantry rifle for WWII? Additionally, which country would have benefited most by switching to that cartridge prior to WWII?"
In my opinion - and I think post-w...
-
Ask Ian: Going Broke Making Guns Duri...
From Jubs on Patreon:
"They say that 'no one's gone bankrupt making guns during a war,' but is that actually true?"It's usually true, but not always. Even during a war, you can make enough bad choices that you can go bankrupt as a gun manufacturer, and Hopkins & Allen is a perfect example of...
